• mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 months ago

    Buying something and shutting it down shouldn’t be possible. You don’t want to own it anymore? Great, they’re independent, good luck have fun. But you didn’t do anything, to say it stopped existing. It is a purely theoretical act. No factory was torn down, no warehouse was liquidated. A video game studio is just a bunch of folks who come in to work on the same thing every weekday. Games are made of labor. If the money stops flowing, that’s a problem, but it shouldn’t be a light-switch existential termination.

    • prof@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      If the studios had the resources they could easily become independent. But the corporate side owns the rights to their works, so the now independent studio doesn’t have any incoming revenue.

      The average employee won’t work for scraps or nothing. So it’s effectively over if big corpo cuts them off.

              • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                That is not what happened here. I am saying: buying a studio and saying whoops you don’t exist anymore should not happen. You are saying: but it does. Because copyright? Even for shit that’s not out yet. A bunch of these closures involve killing unreleased projects, which are obviously never going to go anywhere in the hands of whichever robots own them. Tell me their ownership matters and you will see what backlash looks like.

                • prof@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Thanks for explaining. I was not arguing the point that closures happen, just expanding on why it’s not easy for the studios to get back on their feet again as independents.

                  There will likely be non-disclosure agreements, non-competes or simply IP rights to take into consideration if we want to argue why these studios can’t continue their work. In the end it comes down to legal stuff and money. The IP rights even for unreleased products very likely are with the parent corporation. The same goes for the codebase.

                  So yeah. The studios are left with nothing, except a severance pay if they’re lucky.

                  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Normative statements are a novel concept to some people.

                    Pointing to all that and going AND THAT’S HORSESHIT is not a factual argument - it’s a moral judgement.

                    I’m not saying it’s untrue. I’m saying it’s unacceptable.

                    In short:

                    Fuck.

                    That.

        • Summzashi@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          In that case go fuck yourself and learn some basic economics before you open your hole again.

          • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            bAsIc eCoNoMiCs is even less meaningful than just scoffing about naivete. Which you misspelled.

            I’m making a normative statement about how this studio - which successfully made a beloved and profitable game, as a product that over a million people paid for - was still treated like it failed, lost money, and ruined everything. And that statement is, if success isn’t good enough, that’s fucking bullshit.

            And the thorn that puts in your side is… that it’s not capitalist enough? My guy, do you think the children’s introductory textbook version of supply and demand has a footnote about destroying successful companies for shits and giggles? Or maybe you only spit that libertarian shibboleth at anything besides line-go-up. In just two words, you’ve assured that I don’t know and I don’t care.

            • Summzashi@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              If a misspelled word is your opening argument the rest of your pointless essay isn’t worth reading. Go back to school.

              • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                It wasn’t, but cling to whatever shields your ego.

                And consider your own advice - “basic” doesn’t mean “fundamental.” It means “for children.” Try advanced economics.