The United States House of Representatives has overwhelmingly passed a bill that would expand the federal definition of anti-Semitism, despite opposition from civil liberties groups.
The bill passed the House on Wednesday by a margin of 320 to 91, and it is largely seen as a reaction to the ongoing antiwar protests unfolding on US university campuses. It now goes to the Senate for consideration.
If the bill were to become law, it would codify a definition of anti-Semitism created by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
IHRA’s working definition of anti-Semitism is “a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities”.
According to the IHRA, that definition also encompasses the “targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity”.
The group also includes certain examples in its definition to illustrate anti-Semitism. Saying, for instance, that “the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor” would be deemed anti-Semitic under its terms. The definition also bars any comparison between “contemporary Israeli policy” and “that of the Nazis”.
Rights groups, however, have raised concerns the definition nevertheless conflates criticism of the state of Israel and Zionism with anti-Semitism.
In a letter sent to lawmakers on Friday, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) urged House members to vote against the legislation, saying federal law already prohibits anti-Semitic discrimination and harassment.
“Instead, it would likely chill free speech of students on college campuses by incorrectly equating criticism of the Israeli government with anti-Semitism.”
Liberals try to have critical thinking challenge (impossible)
Terminally online people try to condemn killing innocent civilians including children (impossible)
Talking about yourself? You know, both-siding with the genocide and all
No, shitting on the resistance does not count as “condemning” the occupation.
Consider organizing.
No? I have already condemned the IDFs behavior. It’s obvious their track record is worse.
Like Alsephina said, both-siding an occupation just means passively supporting it.
The same way saying “I condemn the Viet Cong and the US” just means passively supporting the US, condemning any Palestinian resistance organizations and israel just means passively supporting the occupation.
I expressed that Palestine should be free. I’m against the occupation. You’re more interested in politics than human lives. It’s a simple statement: you’re wrong if you kill innocent people.