• Wanderer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Oh the HS2 think maybe could have done something good. Might have been worth removing tonnes of soil and replacing it with tonnes of soil.

    Can’t be remotely as valuable now. HS2 was such a cock up. I’m actually reading a book about railways. Fuck could the Victorians get stuff done. Pick and shovel, no messing.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Given HS2 has already cost more than most European countries spend doing entire network expansions I’m pretty sure it was a massive success for its intended purpose.

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        The UK does things like include railways stations in the project, European countries don’t. Hence the large cost difference.

        But it needs to be done. We still have lines that are 150 years old. It will be worth it.

        Even the shinkansen was over budget and unpopular when being built. Now nobody would argue it wasn’t amazing.

        • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeh but its like an order of a magnitude of difference, we’re spending more than its costing Italy to build a subway through rome which requires a full on archiological dig every 20 feet.