lntl@lemmy.ml to Green - An environmentalist community @lemmy.ml · 1 year agoCurrent Climate: A New Nuclear Reactor Goes Online In Georgiawww.forbes.comexternal-linkmessage-square137fedilinkarrow-up1173arrow-down18file-text
arrow-up1165arrow-down1external-linkCurrent Climate: A New Nuclear Reactor Goes Online In Georgiawww.forbes.comlntl@lemmy.ml to Green - An environmentalist community @lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square137fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareNacktmull@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down23·1 year agoNuclear is so 1954 - renewables are the future!
minus-squareboonhet@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down5·1 year agoRenewables aren’t consistent enough alone, so they need a big consistent buddy to help them out. It could be coal or gas, but we’d much rather have nuclear.
minus-squareClaidheamh@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down3·1 year agoThey’re not mutually exclusive. A society serious about eliminating fossil fuel use needs both.
minus-squarelntl@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down4·1 year agoThe nuclear we built in the 50s is. The technology has come a long way since then, we just haven’t built any.
minus-squarePlayer2@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoNuclear is the past, present, and future (whenever we figure out fusion)
Nuclear is so 1954 - renewables are the future!
Renewables aren’t consistent enough alone, so they need a big consistent buddy to help them out. It could be coal or gas, but we’d much rather have nuclear.
They’re not mutually exclusive. A society serious about eliminating fossil fuel use needs both.
The nuclear we built in the 50s is. The technology has come a long way since then, we just haven’t built any.
Nuclear is the past, present, and future (whenever we figure out fusion)