• Dojan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    No, I’m criticising the fact that the term devalues both the labour put in by people, as well as devaluing the people themselves. You can’t deny that we as a society look down at certain jobs, both in terms of the jobs being unsavoury (handling refuse, cleaning, etc.).

    I’m a software developer, my roomie is a truck driver. We don’t get the same reactions when we introduce ourselves and talk about our jobs. We don’t have the same wages or working conditions either. I have a fixed, yet relaxed schedule, and I can plonk around with my job more or less any time I feel like it. My roomie went to bed at eight today because he has to get up at three, by the time I get up he’ll have worked for four hours. He most likely won’t be home until five, about the time I close my laptop and start cooking, provided I haven’t already started that. Somehow I’m paid more. I’m perceived as more intelligent, and my work is held in higher regard, despite the fact that business grind to a halt and people go without food if my roomie doesn’t do his job. He doesn’t “just” drive from point A to point B, just like I don’t “just” stare at a monitor all day.

    • howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I see what you mean with certain jobs being perceived negatively. Maybe the messaging should be about the value of “unskilled” labour/labourers rather than saying that there’s no such thing as “unskilled” labour? To me, the latter implies that there’s nothing distinguishing “skilled” and “unskilled” labour. The only people who would understand what you’re really trying to say are those who are part of your circle spreading the “message”, and thus it only serves the purpose of saying “I’m on team X! Anyone else?”

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        No, when I say “unskilled labour isn’t a thing” that’s also precisely what I mean. The term indicates that you do not require any sort of skill before doing it; a literal infant could do it. As far as I am aware, no such labour actually exists.

        Are we saying that certain labour requires formal education? Why wouldn’t we simply use a term reflecting that, in that case? I don’t have any formal education in software development, I am entirely autodidact. A profession born from too much free time and not enough friends. Now I’m a professional dev, making software that is core to operations to one of the biggest (in terms of GDP) corporations in my country.

        Is my job then unskilled labour, or am I an unskilled labourer performing skilled labour? In which case, can the labour really be that skilled if an unskilled labourer can do it? If say a taxi driver helps deliver a baby, does that make obstetrics a non-skilled profession, or is it just the birthing part that doesn’t require skill? For that matter, my roomie did actually go through a one year course before he got his trucking license, does that make it a skilled profession?

        It’s a nonsense term. Unskilled labour isn’t a thing; all labour require a measure of skill.

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          Everything requires skills, yes. Some skills take longer to acquire. It’s the difference between taking a random adult on the street and teaching them to perform a job within a week versus a year or more. Whether or not you’re self taught doesn’t change the fact that it didn’t take you a week to learn to code and it’s not something that’s part of a standard curriculum most adults would’ve gone through.

          If you don’t think “unskilled” reflects this distinction properly, suggestions for alternatives are welcome. But I still think this is a distraction from the main problem.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Sorry, but a shovel is unskilled labour. A forklift driver is absolutely not. In the sense that you quite literally need prior qualifications in order to do it, it’s not something any basically functioning adult can do with on-the-job training.

            • Dojan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              I’ve never heard of someone working as a shovel. That said, being able to shovel stuff all day without hurting yourself definitely takes skill.

            • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              You ever why people don’t take you seriously? Its because you say shit like “forklift operators are skilled labour”.

              • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                Using the definition provided by @damnedfurry@lemmy.world (appearing as “ObjectivityIncarnate”), yes, they meet that definition. Forklift drivers are not trained on the job, they need a specific licence. That makes it not unskilled labour.

                  • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    You’re equivocating “skilled” in the same way the OP of this comment chain was to “unskilled”. You’re doing the equivalent of saying “a feather can’t be dark, because feathers are light.” Stop playing stupid semantic games.

                    In the context of labor metrics, “skilled” and “unskilled” are not descriptors of overall difficulty. I’ve already posted a reminder of what the terms mean in this context above your comment, so there’s no excuse.

                  • Five@slrpnk.netOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Your comment has been removed due to using a slur. Please be more inclusive of our friends and allies with mental disabilities in the future.

          • Five@slrpnk.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Your comment has been removed due to using a slur. Please be more inclusive of our friends and allies with mental disabilities in the future.