• accideath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yea but like, their competitors, when it comes to operating systems are Apple, which isn’t anywhere near small enough to be obtainable by anyone and Linux and Linux-Derivatives, which are also unobtainable due to their open source nature.

    • FoolishOwl@social.coop
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      @accideath The point isn’t whether Microsoft will reach that end. The point is that like all capitalist enterprises it will forever strive to do so.

          • accideath@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Not every larger company is automatically evil, just because they exist within a capitalist market. A lot of them are, sure. At least to some extent. But there still are privately owned enterprises that do have a conscience.

            Also, calling them “capitalist” enterprises seems redundant.

            • FoolishOwl@social.coop
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              @accideath I’m calling them capitalist enterprises to emphasize that they are capitalist enterprises. They accumulate capital. That is what they are and defines what they do.

              A capitalist enterprise does not decide it has enough and can retire and take up gardening. It is not a person. It does not have a conscience.

              • accideath@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                A privately owned enterprise can. Publicly traded ones can’t. A privately owned enterprise also doesn’t need to make more money, if the owner doesn’t want that. A publicly traded company that has to answer to its shareholders has to make more money and to keep growing to appease said shareholders. If you don’t have shareholders you don’t have to do anything like that. That doesn’t mean, of course, that any privately owned company is automatically good – many aren’t – but it does mean that they have the capability to not be evil.

                • FoolishOwl@social.coop
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  @accideath We started by talking about Microsoft, and I was explaining that there’s no such thing as “enough” profit for a capitalist enterprise.

                  There are many organizations that are not capitalist enterprises. There are small businesses and cooperatives where the owners deliberately keep profits low. The small business doesn’t have a conscience; the owners may. And it leaves them vulnerable. Small businesses destroyed or absorbed by larger ones is the third oldest story in capitalism.

                  • accideath@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    As long as we‘re in a capitalist market, which we are and probably will be for a while, any for-profit company, however small or big it is or however private or public it is, is a capitalist company. You have to be in order to make profit. At all. And yes, usually, the bigger they are, the worse they are. But not every for-profit company is evil, thus not every capitalist company is evil.

                    And businesses do have a conscience. It’s the sum of their owners‘ consciences.

                    And also, you do not need to be evil to be successful although it is probably easier.