• DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Yes, so we are talking about a sentence in the headline where we don’t have extra context, yet you make an sentence where it is clear the sentence is stupid based on outside context and argue it should be interpreted the other way around because otherwise we know it is stupid. Amazing logic.

    Just because I can deduce what you actually meant does not mean the sentence is correct.

      • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I for one don’t know how many astronauts are being sent to the moon when. And if most people do, no point writing this article, is there?

          • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            So what? No one is saying the sentence says or implies for the first time. It just implies one person will be going this time.

            • ABCDE@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              So you know the context. It doesn’t imply that, just a faulty assumption/logical fallacy.

              • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                That is like me saying there is one pope and your takeaway is there is at least one. Yes, the sentence does not explicitly state there is only one, but it strongly implies it, just like the title.

                • ABCDE@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  It doesn’t state it, and it’s not really important if it’s one of a few on a crew (as you would expect).

                  • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    That’s like someone boasting he rode the Tour de France and then claiming it is not important he rode it on a motorbike. There is a big difference between another nation reaching the moon and a foreigner hitching a ride with the Americans.

                    PS: No matter how much you try to move the goal post, I said “implies” from the start and you said it doesn’t. I ain’t falling for “it does not state it”.