boem@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agoAI will reduce workforce, say 41% of execs in a surveywww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square222fedilinkarrow-up1366arrow-down127cross-posted to: artificial_intel@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1339arrow-down1external-linkAI will reduce workforce, say 41% of execs in a surveywww.theregister.comboem@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square222fedilinkcross-posted to: artificial_intel@lemmy.ml
minus-squarebionicjoey@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 months ago humans can be shifted to more creative roles It’s a fallacy to assume that there will always be enough jobs for everyone who wants a job.
minus-squarehansl@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 months agoAlso I’ve met enough people with “ideas” that I reject the premise. Really creative talented people are rare.
minus-squareMeanEYE@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·4 months agoIt has been the case for a while now despite same being said for every important technological advancement.
minus-squarebionicjoey@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-24 months agoThus why it’s a fallacy Edit: also it literally hasn’t. There have been many times in human history where there simply weren’t enough low-skill jobs for everyone who needed a job to support their family. See the Great Depression.
It’s a fallacy to assume that there will always be enough jobs for everyone who wants a job.
Also I’ve met enough people with “ideas” that I reject the premise. Really creative talented people are rare.
It has been the case for a while now despite same being said for every important technological advancement.
Thus why it’s a fallacy
Edit: also it literally hasn’t. There have been many times in human history where there simply weren’t enough low-skill jobs for everyone who needed a job to support their family. See the Great Depression.