The reposts and expressions of shock from public figures followed quickly after a user on the social platform X who uses a pseudonym claimed that a government website had revealed “skyrocketing” rates of voters registering without a photo ID in three states this year — two of them crucial to the presidential contest.

“Extremely concerning,” X owner Elon Musk replied twice to the post this past week.

“Are migrants registering to vote using SSN?” Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, an ally of former President Donald Trump, asked on Instagram, using the acronym for Social Security number.

Trump himself posted to his own social platform within hours to ask, “Who are all those voters registering without a Photo ID in Texas, Pennsylvania, and Arizona??? What is going on???”

Yet by the time they tried to correct the record, the false claim had spread widely. In three days, the pseudonymous user’s claim amassed more than 63 million views on X, according to the platform’s metrics. A thorough explanation from Richer attracted a fraction of that, reaching 2.4 million users.

The incident sheds light on how social media accounts that shield the identities of the people or groups behind them through clever slogans and cartoon avatars have come to dominate right-wing political discussion online even as they spread false information.

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    7 months ago

    Oh, cool, a well researched article on right-wing disinformation campaigns. Can’t wait to watch the Lemmy liberals accuse leftists of being a part of this without any evidence.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, I did notice this article had a weirdly anti-anonymity undertone, as though corporate algorithms designed push conflict and sensationalism weren’t the driving force of disinformation.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m really happy with all the fucking porn bans and want more, yes please daddy, go through everything I"m doing and punish me for everytime I didn’t kiss the America Flag

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Can’t wait for these supposed “leftists” who-are-totally-not-righties-hiding-behind-anonymity to take for granted literally all the historical and modern day progress that came through none other than — you guessed it — the liberal legislature and liberal Justices.

        From child labor laws to the civil rights act to same sex marriage — thank a liberal.

        (Disclaimer: I’m further left than liberal on the political spectrum)

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Lmao, yeah, thank the well known liberals and liberals only, like MLK and Malcolm X, for civil rights they were forced to acknowledge or face race riots.

          Definitely wasn’t the liberal establishment that assassinated them either. And liberal is the opposite of conservative btw 🤣

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Don’t bother, I just wasted a full day arguing with this guy on exactly this topic, and he just kept doubling down. I even quoted the portion of Letter from a Birmingham Jail about white moderates and his response was, “But then white moderates passed the Civil Rights Act a year later! How curious!” There is no amount of information that will convince him that moderate Liberals weren’t responsible for the victories of the Civil Right movement.

            Edit: See what I mean? Guys desperate for my attention 2 days later.

              • pjwestin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Exactly. Every time Liberals yield to pressure from leftists, these chuds want to credit the Liberals.

            • lennybird@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              This confidently-incorrect fellow, who:

              • Increasingly deflected,
              • resorted to more personal attacks and,
              • ultimately ran away from the discussion after I started citing primary sourced quotes like:

              the biggest headaches for Democratic leader Mike Mansfield often came not from Republicans but from the conservative bloc of his own party caucus

              and:

              Dominating the GOP caucus, many conservatives believed the civil rights bill represented an unprecedented intrusion by the state into the daily lives of Americans.

              and:

              You had a battle with the conservatives on the committee, the southern Democrats, conservative Republicans, but you had just as tough a battle with the liberals. Their position was the old story of the half loaf or three-quarters of a loaf, and [now they were saying] “we’ll settle for nothing less [than the whole loaf.]” . . . We shared their views, and we’d love to do it their way.

              From https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/civil_rights/cloture_finalpassage.htm and https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2004/summer/civil-rights-act

              For which he could not even respond to let alone refute — Truly believed the 1963 Birmingham letter was some smoking-gun when — checks notes — those same white moderates MLK Jr. was talking about wound up passingthe Civil Rights Act 1 year later.

              Yes, you read those quotes correctly: Liberals were pushing to strengthen the Civil Rights Act while conservatives were trying to water it down.

              Smh.

              Don’t tell him which ideology such surviving activists from John Lewis of the Edmund Pettus Bridge march or Jim Clyburn, both of the civil Rights era joined under.

              Edit: See what I mean, guys? Still has nothing substantive to respond with. Truth can hurt sometimes. I’m still floored he tried to claim that conservatives supported the Civil Rights Act more than Liberals lol.

          • lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            Isn’t it funny that civil rights activists of the time from John Lewis to Clyburn joined the liberal Democrats?

            But yes two things can happen simultaneously: there can be activists, and then there can be liberals who actually passed the Civil Rights Act. You know, liberals.

            Sure wasn’t confederate conservatives now was it?

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Can’t tell if you’re saying Liberals are good or if Same Sex Marriage and Civil Rights are bad… not comfortable either way

    • juicy@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I have it on very good authority from several Lemmy libs that I’m a Russian troll.

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Well, the types of misinformation will vary but anywhere people gather and have discussions is bound to have some bullshit floating around that gets spread around. It’s a fault of humanity, not of any particular persuasion. But there is a far cry from rumors about how to find the Triforce in Ocarina of Time to shit like “vaccines cause autism” and such.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Yeah, but there’s a tendency online in liberal circles to think that any criticism from the left is right-wing or foreign interference. I’ve seen a lot of people in the political groups here claim that the leftists they’re arguing with are part of hostile disinformation campaigns, which is just silly; online propagandists make Facebook Groups and Pages to create memes and articles, and hundreds of sock-puppet accounts to disseminate them. They don’t waste hours writing dozens of replies to a single account on a small, niche website.

        • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          In the brave new world of LLMs, it no longer takes hours to write comments and replies all day in favour of some political or commercial view. The whole process can be automated! Cool, right?

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Well, I’ve never used an LLM to argue with strangers online, but I would imagine that it would take a lot of effort to keep getting coherent responses to every comment. But even if it is fast and easy, are you really suggesting that right-wing or foreign trolls are concentrating on individual arguments on niche communities? I’ve heard of fake news outlets, astroturfed hashtags, propaganda memes, reply spam, and other broad influence campaigns, but I’ve never heard of troll farms being used for individual arguments, especially on small websites. It seems like, even did take minimal effort, it would also have minimal influence. Do you have any evidence this is happening?

            • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Well, I’ve seen clear examples of AIs responding to comments on hot-button topics on reddit. But I guess that isn’t a small website. In any case, the only point I was really trying to make is that widespread social manipulation is becoming easier. If someone decides they want to influence a discussion somewhere, they can do that without a great deal of effort. The comments don’t have to be detailed or coherent. Simply being on-topic and persistent is enough, raising vaguely relevant talking-points whenever a response is expected.

        • ultranaut@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Part of the problem is there’s lots of gullible people who repeat whatever nonsense makes them feel righteous. It’s usually not clear if you’re talking to a dumbass who fell for right-wing or Russian imperialist talking points, or an actual neonazi pretending to be a misguided leftist for trolling purposes, or an actual Russian imperialist pretending to be a misguided leftist for trolling purposes. I think you’re right though that Lemmy is not a likely target for any kind of organized propaganda campaign because it’s relatively tiny and would be a waste of time for those sorts of groups.