• PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    having a market share like that is a form of monopoly. It’s obviously different from absolute monopoly, but they wield too much power as is.

    And to be fair, running games on linux without steam is definitely more tricky than without.

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      There are two requirements to be considered a monopoly, or fall under antitrust laws:

      1. Have a large market share
      2. Be able to force competing products out of the market

      Steam meets point 1, it doesn’t meet point 2. On the other hand, things like the Apple App Store, don’t meet point 1, but meet point 2, which makes them more likely to fall under antitrust. Windows meets both points, which is why the US sued Microsoft for not letting people choose their browser.

      • Onihikage@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, we only have to look at the FTC’s lawsuit against Amazon to see what they consider an antitrust problem:

        […] Amazon violates the law not because it is big, but because it engages in a course of exclusionary conduct that prevents current competitors from growing and new competitors from emerging. By stifling competition on price, product selection, quality, and by preventing its current or future rivals from attracting a critical mass of shoppers and sellers, Amazon ensures that no current or future rival can threaten its dominance.

        That isn’t what we see from Valve - in fact it’s the opposite, as Valve’s strategy with Steam is simply to provide the best service and be the gold standard. The competition is almost always compared unfavorably to Steam, because gamers know how it feels to use a mature platform that isn’t trying to abuse them.

        Valve has even taken some steps that wind up increasing competition in adjacent markets, such as operating systems (Proton has contributed significantly to Linux popularity) and even handheld game devices (Steam Deck set off an arms race when electronics manufacturers realized Nintendo is asleep at the wheel). Steam is as pro-consumer as it gets, with the exception of GOG and possibly itch.

    • exanime@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      But I always assumed that, unless you are blocking competition, it’s not legally a monopoly and harder to penalize (not that they actually penalize monopolies much in north America)

      Other than making a good product and easier to run games on Linux, there is nothing preventing anyone to install other launchers or games on their own or game makers from selling through other launchers or independently, etc