• Pantherina@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Ubuntu may be good at being semi-stable.

        Just run unsnap and experience actually secure apps.

        Did you know that Snaps are only sandboxed on Ubuntu with Apparmor? This makes them more versatile than Flatpaks using Bubblewrap (the whole system is sandboxed like that) but will break all sandboxing if systems dont use Apparmor, or dont include all patches.

    • fluckx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      But not voluntarily. Since it’s.integrated with apt you randomly get snap garbage installed instead.

    • okamiueru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Last I used Ubuntu, removing snap was a one time thing that took 5 minutes, of which 4 of them was looking for my notes from the time before.

      I ditched Ubuntu, but it wasn’t because of snap. Maybe this has changed in the last 3 years?

      • KISSmyOS@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes. Now if you use apt to install Firefox or Thunderbird, it will reinstall snap and install the snap versions of those programs.
        If you blacklist snap, it’ll throw an error when you try to install Firefox or Thunderbird cause it can’t resolve their “dependencies”.
        You’ll have to install those programs from outside of Ubuntu’s repositories, and the list of affected programs is growing.
        Ubuntu’s stated goal is to eventually use snap for all userland apps.

        • echo64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          This thread is a good example of just how circlejerky and bubble like lemmy has become.

          You are correct. Outside of the hard-core users and tech nerds, Ubuntu is massively popular. But you listen to this community, and you’d think the opposite.

          • shirro@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Most of us do live in bubbles (not exclusive to lemmy or tech nerds). I first picked up Ubuntu in 2004. It was a massive leap forward at the time as Gnome was moving a lot faster than Debian stable and I was running Sid to keep up. I am genuinely surprised everytime I learn Ubuntu is still “popular” as they have made so many NIH misteps over the years (mir,upstart,unity,snap) and frustrated their users. I moved back to Debian years ago for server/dev as Ubuntu re-packaging wasn’t adding any value and once I was on another distro for desktop I lost all interest.

            Ubuntu started off with some amazing community building. It felt more like a peoples distro than Canonicals for a time. I felt more invested in it in those days so I can relate to Ubuntu users but I also understand some of the criticism aimed at Canonical and their choices.

          • woelkchen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            You are correct. Outside of the hard-core users and tech nerds, Ubuntu is massively popular. But you listen to this community, and you’d think the opposite.

            So which part of the internet is Steam Hardware & Software Survey then?

            The most popular Ubuntu version is at a whopping 5% of all Linux users.

            Ubuntu went from the most popular desktop distribution to the most or at least one of the most popular container distributions, ie. for hard-core users and tech nerds. Meanwhile Steam Deck sold millions and I’m confident to say that a good chunk of the users have no idea what Steam Deck runs, let alone SteamOS being an Arch Linux derivative.

            • meleethecat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              24
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Very few linux installs include steam and this survey only represents a few thousand gamers. The only thing it shows is that steam users like steam os.

              • woelkchen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Very few linux installs include steam

                Millions of sold Steam Deck units run Linux and default to Steam. It’s easily the most popular personal computing device running GNU/Linux out there.

                steam users

                So regular users, “outside of the hard-core users and tech nerds”.

                • billgamesh@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  i wonder how many old thinkpads are still running linux… Honestly, it’s possible some arbitrary single model may still outnumber steam decks.

                  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    I think you’re forgetting about AWS, GCP, Azure.

                    No, I’m not. Had you read my comments correctly, you’d know that I was stating repeatedly that Ubuntu is popular for containers but that’s is a completely different topic.

            • SheeEttin@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              7 months ago

              That’s not a meaningful comparison because it splits Ubuntu by version but all of Arch is a single category. We’d need to roll up the Ubuntu users for it to be apples to apples.

      • Shamot@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Like Windows, Ubuntu is installed by default on many computers. In my university, all the computers have a dual boot Ubuntu Windows.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          7 months ago

          Ubuntu is installed by default on many computers.

          SteamOS is installed on more computers, though.

          • gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            You don’t honestly believe that, right? Like you’re aware that the Steam hardware survey only includes Steam users that have it installed and choose to participate in the survey? There are way more computers and servers running Ubuntu than there are steam decks.

            • woelkchen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              7 months ago

              You don’t honestly believe that, right?

              Context is computers dual booting Windows and Ubuntu, so obviously consumer hardware and not servers and also not multiple containers on one device. There are millions of Steam Decks sold already and Steam Deck is consumer hardware which means that there are millions of individual devices running SteamOS.

              servers running Ubuntu

              Sure there are hardcore users that run dozens of containers simultaneously and Ubuntu is quite a popular choice among those. Completely different topic from the one I’ve replied to, though.

              • metaldream@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Steam numbers are completely meaningless. There’s absolutely no way SteamOS outnumbers Ubuntu even if we limit this comparison to desktop installs. Ubuntu’s been around for a very long time and many of its users wouldn’t show up on Steam because they don’t game.

                • lengau@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  If you look at just my household, Ubuntu and its derivatives outnumber SteamOS by a factor of 7:1, not even counting numerous VMs and containers, or 3:1 if you’re just counting desktops, laptops and tablets. But if you look at my steam usage, Ubuntu hasn’t shown up there in over a year.

                  I probably spend 10x as much time on Ubuntu machines as I spend on my Steam Deck, but the Steam hardware survey would never surface that fact, nor is it intended to.

                  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    If you look at just my household

                    No, I won’t because anecdotal evidence is no statistic.

                • woelkchen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Steam numbers are completely meaningless.

                  No, they are an actual statistic, whereas you deniers just have gut feeling and literally nothing else.

                  There’s absolutely no way SteamOS outnumbers Ubuntu even if we limit this comparison to desktop installs.

                  [citation needed]

                  • lengau@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    As I’ve already explained to you elsewhere, that’s not how this works. You are the one who made the claim. The burden is on you to provide a good backing for said claim. When people asked for that backing, you provided something that does not back up that claim. It’s not on anyone else to provide an alternative claim, as that would be a variation of attempting to shift the burden of proof.

                    Personally, I’m not sure if good enough data to provide an answer to everyone’s satisfaction exists. But that doesn’t mean we get to shortcut the process by claiming that a data set means something it doesn’t. Some other data that one could theoretically provide that would be of similar quality to what you’ve provided (that is, decent quality data that measures something related but cannot be reasonably extrapolated to verify or falsify your claim) include:

                    • Distro breakdowns from the Snap store (this would overrepresent distros with Snap preinstalled)
                    • Distro breakdowns from Flathub (this would overrepresent distros with Flatpak preinstalled and flathub preconfigured)
                    • Distro breakdowns from web statistics (this would underrepresent privacy-centric distros and hide the distro for people who, for example, use a flatpak of their browser)
                    • Cloud vendor distro breakdowns
            • Pantherina@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              That should be possible by changing the repos, shouldnt it? I will try this in a VM.

              Downgrading will be harder than rebasing from Ubuntu LTS to Debian Sid for example. But at the same time I imagine its easier to downgrade from Sid to Stable on the same Distro.

          • Dandroid@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Not the person you are replying to, but my server is on Ubuntu. It was the distro my work used and it was probably the only distro I had heard of at the time I set up my server. At this point I run so much shit that can never go down on my server that I will never consider touching the distro ever.

            Plus, who cares? It’s a server. I don’t interact with the distro. I only ssh in, run services through containers, and add port forwards. Every distro is identical for that stuff. I even prefer old kernel and package versions for ultra stability, as my server can never go down. Sure, Debian would be the same, but why touch it now? That’s just asking for headache.

                • delirious_owl@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Everything downloaded in snap is vulnerable because snap does not cryptographically verify all packages, unlike apt.

                  Also Ubuntu has newer packages in apt than Debian, which is more dangerous.

                  • lengau@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    snap does not cryptographically verify all packages, unlike apt

                    This isn’t correct. Run snap download htop from your terminal and you’ll receive two files: The actual squashfs image that gets mounted in /snap/htop/<revision number> and a .assert file that cryptographic signature data about this snap file. Modify the squashfs image and snap won’t let you install it without passing --dangerous to bypass that check, just like apt-get’s --allow-unauthenticated.

                    The problem here exists at a different level: the level of what’s getting signed. Conceptually speaking, running sudo snap install htop is a bit like running sudo add-apt-repository ppa:maxiberta/htop && sudo apt install htop. The package is built by the owner of the snap/ppa, and what Canonical is cryptographically verifying to you is that they got this from the owner of the (snap|ppa). This is roughly equivalent to domain verification for HTTPS (the type of HTTPS certificates Let’s Encrypt uses).

                    There are some different security considerations. For a snap, you need to be aware of the publisher each time you install something new. For PPAs, on the other hand, you only have to worry about this when you add a new PPA. However, the trade-off also works in the other direction. One snap can’t just replace another snap on your system, whereas a malicious PPA could provide, for example, a malicious libc6 update.

                    These are both different (and lesser) assertions than what Ubuntu makes with its standard apt repositories. But they are still cryptographically backed.

                • woelkchen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  You’re literally replying under a submission that’s about unreviewed malware that got accepted in their repo.

                  • Dandroid@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Those are snaps. I don’t use those on my server. AFAIK, they’re mostly used for GUI applications. I don’t even have a GUI on my server. I wouldn’t even know how to install or run a snap from command line.

                    Most things that run in my server are containerized services that I wrote personally. So as long as there isn’t a vulnerability in podman or my reverse proxy, and as long as keep my base containers up to date (they pull the latest base image each time the image is built), I’m mostly fine.

          • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I use it because a class wanted me to either use it in a VM or use WSL but WSL didn’t work and I figured it was easier to set up a dual boot than setting up a VM since I’ve installed Linux quite a few times.

      • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        People still use Ubuntu?

        They’re currently number 6 on DistroWatch’s Last 6 Months. So people are at least still interested in it.

        The DistroWatch Page Hit Ranking statistics are a light-hearted way of measuring interest in Linux distributions and other free operating systems among the visitors of this website. They correlate neither to usage nor to quality and should not be used to measure the market share of distributions. They simply show the number of times a distribution page on DistroWatch was accessed each day, nothing more.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          They simply show the number of times a distribution page on DistroWatch was accessed each day, nothing more.

          Which can be manipulated by scripting or setting the browser’s home page to the DistroWatch page of a distribution. No way in hell is MX Linux actually popular.