• Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    They are a monopoly because they’ve had the best product on the market consistently for 15 years. There used to be huge resistance to them and their drm from gamers, but they have shown over many years that they are trustworthy, unlike others that have tried this.

    This is not an Apple or Google store situation where proper competition could not exist. They were always up against giants like Microsoft, EA, Ubisoft or more recently Epic.

    • Gnome Kat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      8 months ago

      No they don’t, Steam barely ever gets updated, it’s not magically better than the others it’s just the one everyone uses.

      Digital storefronts are natural monopolies. No one wants to use a different game launcher because it’s annoying to remember multiple passwords, to remember which game is where, to install and have multiple launchers running. None of that is Valve doing some amazing engineering that no one else has done, it’s just the natural state of game launcher / storefront economics. The only reason Steam is what people prefer is because it was the first one on the scene and has the lion share of users and games for sale.

      We see the same thing happen with streaming platforms, the same thing happen with social networks. And Steam is also a social network which reinforces the monopoly. The other launches have friends and chat and shit but no one uses it because their friends are on steam or discord.

      • anyhow2503@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t doubt that Steam being first to market is the biggest reason for their success, but you make it sound as if there’s some alternative store that is better for the consumer in some way. What’s the alternative? I have yet to see any other store/launcher come close to Steam in terms of features, even more so when it comes to Linux support, which Valve have turned into a viable gaming OS pretty much by themselves. In the end, even exclusivity and drastically lower fees for publishers didn’t make EGS the success that Tim Sweeney wishes it was and I think at that point being first to market can’t be the only explanation. They have to be doing something right.

      • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Today, yes, I agree. It’s really hard to compete with them anymore. But 15 years ago when everyone was rushing to capture the market, there were many opportunities to do so. Steam and valve were never infallible, but at least they took feedback and stayed consistent, unlike their competitors.

      • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Well if its a natural monopoly, they can be regulated to assure the price is fair and developers get a fair share of the returns.