• archon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “If you are not rich because you were lucky, you are rich because you took it.”

    Gotcha. So, what does social democracy have to do with it again?

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Social democracy is a way for capitalism to mask its cruelty by fully exporting all of the suffering it generates. It’s totally unsustainable without other countries to steal from or wrecking the environment, because at the end of the day it’s still capitalism and everything that entails.

      We don’t need to tax the rich. We need to do something else to them. 😘

      • FreeLunch@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Would you say that the average citizen of a developed nation is one of these rich or is benefiting from the rich? They probably make up the most of these statistics about happiness.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would say that social democracy is better at distributing the superprofits from imperialism among its citizens. I’m even somewhat cynical about it, and believe Norwegians have a legitimate interest in opposing international socialism because they benefit more from imperialism than they would if they were forced into equality with the rest of the world (at least until international socialism uplifted the rest of the world)

          I also don’t think it is sustainable. Blowback is inevitable.