Any guides on how to host at home? I’m always afraid that opening ports in my home router means taking the heavy risk of being hacked. Does using something like CloudFlare help? I am a complete beginner.

  • Midas@ymmel.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    First you’ve got to determine where threats can come from, then which surfaces are vulnerable and eventually the reach. In short what I mean:

    SSH port (default 22) is high on the threat encounter level. Lots of bots try to scan every host they can find for an open SSH port. The risk is high because this is a doorway to your network. There’s honestly no good reason to have port 22 open to your home. Get tailscale vpn. There are alternatives, I use tailscale, it’s great.

    When youre hosting apps, they can also be vulnerable. Keep them updated and you’ll mostly be fine. There are levels of security. Super super secure is creating seperate networks for these apps so they can’t access others. Bit much imo. Use non-rooted docker, enough of a sandbox.

    In the end you’re a small fish in a big pond, not saying you should be a cowboy but with a few decent measures you should be OK.

    Tl;dr

    • don’t open port 22
    • use a VPN (tailscale)
    • update apps
    • non-rooted docker
    • iliketurtles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s wrong with exposing port 22? I have password authentication disabled, ssh keys only. Isn’t that secure enough?

      • macgregor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I do as well on a non-standard port, although that doesn’t really provide any extra security. I found ssh only login acceptably secure personally, but it’s definitely less secure than tailscale which can operate with 0 open ports. The risk would be from os/sshd vulnerabilities that can be exploited. As long as you keep the router up to date it should be safe enough.

        • easeKItMAn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Why would you expose SSH on a home production server?
          Hosting several dockerized apps for friends since years. Only 80/443 proxy ports are open. Apps are secured with 2FA and monitored by fail2ban + kept up-to-date. Never had any issue.

          • macgregor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s for the chance that I need to administer my cluster when I am not on my LAN. I can set up a port forward to the externally accessible port and everything works as normal like I’m on my LAN. Non-default port, password auth disabled, ssh with root disabled (so you have to have my user and ssh key) and limited ssh connection attempts before ban. I can toggle it on or off with a check box on my router. Yes, I understand there are other ways that are even more secure, yes I understand the risks, but for my circumstances this was a good balance of convenience and security. I’ve also never had an issue :).

          • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why not? Openssh has proven itself to be reasonable secure. Porbably more research went into its security then most apps you are hosting.

            • easeKItMAn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think it’s not so much “insecure” as that it’s that external SSH access is less secure than no access. And for home-managed systems exposed externally, I would recommend a smaller attack area.