bogokeb@futurology.today to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoAre these the supposed "benefits" of waylandfuturology.todayimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up130arrow-down162
arrow-up1-32arrow-down1imageAre these the supposed "benefits" of waylandfuturology.todaybogokeb@futurology.today to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 months agoDepends on the implementation. The reference, Weston, is not.
minus-squareKata1yst@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-29 months agoWeston is by file size, about equal to xserver. But really there is more utility in Weston than xserver.
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-28 months agoBut it’s one monolith, same as X.
minus-squareKata1yst@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 months agoXorg needs several of it’s extensions to function at the same level as Weston+Wayland. At minimum you’d need xorg server, proto, lib, and driver… Maybe a few other things I’m forgetting.
Depends on the implementation. The reference, Weston, is not.
Weston is by file size, about equal to xserver. But really there is more utility in Weston than xserver.
But it’s one monolith, same as X.
Xorg needs several of it’s extensions to function at the same level as Weston+Wayland. At minimum you’d need xorg server, proto, lib, and driver… Maybe a few other things I’m forgetting.