Frozen embryos are “children,” according to Alabama’s Supreme Court::IVF often produces more embryos than are needed or used.

  • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why the fuck should we ever have to ask a judge this? Hey judge why don’t you tell us how we cure cancer? Judge, judge, what is dark matter? Please, you are the ultimate authority on all things!

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well get used to it because the US Supreme Court is about to (probably) do away with Chevron deference.

    • nymwit@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s stupid but the article says why:

      In the Alabama case, a hospital patient wandered through an unlocked door, removed frozen, preserved embryos from subzero storage and, suffering an ice burn, dropped the embryos, destroying them. Affected IVF patients filed wrongful-death lawsuits against the IVF clinic under the state’s Wrongful Death of a Minor Act. The case was initially dismissed in a lower court, which ruled the embryos did not meet the definition of a child. But the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that “it applies to all children, born and unborn, without limitation.” In a concurring opinion, Chief Justice Tom Parker cited his religious beliefs and quoted the Bible to support the stance.

      • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I know why the courts would ask but in general this is something a single judge has no authority on. The idea that a single person gets to define what “life” is absurdity. We have army’s of scholars following strict rules of logic, ethics, and are backed by science. Their consensus is more compatible with human society than some dusty book.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Monkey paw. “You’re absolutely right, these eggs need to be implanted into women right away. Oh look right here, we have a whole prison population of slaves”

  • Facebones@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Every woman with a frozen embryo.

    Get those child tax credits.

    Don’t have frozen embryos? Freeze some

    Get those child tax credits

    • TellusChaosovich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      That is not legal. They have made embryos children when looking for people to put in jail, and not children when looking to give out benefits. Very convenient for the state budget!

  • BaronVonBort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 months ago

    My wife and I had our son via IVF. We wanted every single one of our fertilized eggs to work, but they didn’t. We had one that did and we suffered every time one didn’t.

    Fuck Alabama for adding on to the torment and emotional suffering families going through IVF and any kind of infertility suffer already. It’s just adding unspeakable cruelty again.

    • essteeyou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ve seen my sister going through this process for years. It’s emotionally challenging, financially challenging, and risky to her health. She’s had two ectopic pregnancies and had to be operated on twice. If she manages to have one baby she’ll be happy, and there’s no way it would make sense to implant all the other embryos given the health risk to her. So what would Alabama have her do?

      I’m glad she doesn’t live there.

        • Jojo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I have heard someone say in all seriousness that it’s still murder to abort an ectopic pregnancy (which would just kill the mom and ‘child’ if allowed to continue)…

      • unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Based on your post history, you’ll just delete your comment within a few hours anyway, but have you considered that if adoption was such a perfect solution then more people would adopt?

        Instead of simply imagining simple solutions to complex problems, maybe try having a bit of empathy and see where that takes you?

        Good luck.

          • unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            It feels like you’re suggesting that adoption is a panacea, but for a majority of couples, it simply isn’t. I agree it could be considered selfish, but selfishness is a virtue in our society so I am asserting that it should be expected and accounted for, rather than simply waving your hand at its inherent issues and pretending they’ll go away.

            Adoption has been proposed and has failed as a satisfactory solution to this problem for millenia, what has changed about it to make it relevant now?

      • rambaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Muslims don’t believe that life starts at conception. So no, on this topic they are not as idiotic as Christians.

          • rambaroo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Turkey and Kazakhstan. And this is just racist bs. Not all Muslims hate Jews or have regressive views. Not to mention this is all off topic, it’s Christians who are trying to destroy women’s rights in America not Muslims

            • BaardFigur@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Turkey is a hybrid regime, scoring rather low on the democracy index (https://freedomhouse.org/country/turkey/freedom-world/2023), with aggressive retoric towards Greece, Cyprus and Armenia. Making unreasonable demands towards Sweden in return for NATO membership. Non-muslims are discriminated against, and they’re turning churches into mosques. I expected Turkey to be proposed, but Turkey is not a good example, even though it’s “less bad” than other options.

              Maybe christians are the problem in America, but in most west European countries, muslims are the ones causing issues. Racist bs? A religion isn’t a race. I wasn’t the one starting to hate on religion, it was another guy hating on Christianity. Remember?

              Kazakhstan: Not great either https://freedomhouse.org/country/kazakhstan/nations-transit/2023

              • rambaroo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Turkey isn’t much worse than countries like Hungary or Poland when it comes to democracy. And Kazakhstan is in the middle of democratic reform

                Also I like how you ignored the rest of my comment. But not surprised

                Edit: and people were shitting on Christianity because Christians have huge amounts of power in the US. Far more than Muslims do in any western country. It’s Christians trying to destroy secular rights in the West. You brought up Muslims for no reason other than to deflect

                • BaardFigur@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Setting the bar low with Orbanistan I see (which is still more democratic than Turkey btw).

                  Poland isn’t doing any worse than USA, and is straight up silly comparing it to Turkey, especially after their last election, replacing the PiS Prime Minister.

  • Skates@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    A group of Alabama residents decide to rob a bank. They put on their ski masks, grab their guns, run in, yell for everyone to get down and they start looking for the vault. They ransack every office, but all they find are some fancy coolers. Tired from the search and hot from wearing ski masks in Alabama, they open one of them up to find a bunch of cool refreshing yogurt. They drink it, cool off a bit, and then they go looking for the manager. They find this nice looking guy in a suit and tie:

    “Hey, are you the manager of this bank?”, they yell, pointing a gun at his face.

    “Yes sir, I am”, the guy is shaking and scared, but tries to keep calm.

    “Take us to your vault, right fucking now!”

    “Vault? Sir this is a sperm bank”

  • Josie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    In the Alabama case, a hospital patient wandered through an unlocked door, removed frozen, preserved embryos from subzero storage and, suffering an ice burn, dropped the embryos, destroying them. Affected IVF patients filed wrongful-death lawsuits against the IVF clinic under the state’s Wrongful Death of a Minor Act. The case was initially dismissed in a lower court, which ruled the embryos did not meet the definition of a child. But the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that “it applies to all children, born and unborn, without limitation.” In a concurring opinion, Chief Justice Tom Parker cited his religious beliefs and quoted the Bible to support the stance.

    absolutely wild case

  • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    In a concurring opinion, Chief Justice Tom Parker cited his religious beliefs and quoted the Bible to support the stance.

    “Human life cannot be wrongfully destroyed without incurring the wrath of a holy God, who views the destruction of His image as an affront to Himself,” Parker wrote. “Even before birth, all human beings bear the image of God, and their lives cannot be destroyed without effacing his glory.”

    wtf

      • TellusChaosovich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        No the religious zealots here do not. School coaches require prayer before practices and games, same sex couples get banned from prom, kids at school get tricked into going to fun after school events that turn out to actually be evangelism stunts. A lot of applications to educational programs, gymnastics programs, and jobs ask about “leadership” which is code for experience as a church deacon or active evangelist.

      • Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The USA has never done seperation of church and state.

        If we did, half the govt would be arrested for extremism and most churches would be terrorist organizations.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ironic that he quoted the Bible since the Bible is okay with abortion.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The Bible doesn’t really say anything about abortion. The most convincing thing I’ve seen is that it values the life of a mother over that a fetus, but it doesn’t say abortion is okay. Unless I’m missing something.

        Not that it matters what this book says, I just don’t think it helps at all to misrepresent it.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            At least the other poster offered up what is effectively a completely made up verse.

            • prole@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              “effectively made up verse” LOL

              Ah ok, so are you the arbiter of which stories in the Bible are literal, and which aren’t? Because that story seemed very fucking literal.

              Anyway, this can’t be the first time you’ve encountered a contradiction in the text of your holy book (assuming you’ve even read it), so I’m sure you’ve already got some pretty effective ways of ignoring the cognitive dissonance inherent in your worldview… So go ahead and have fun with that I guess.

              • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                this can’t be the first time you’ve encountered a contradiction in the text of your holy book

                lol. I’m not a Christian. You’re just exposing your lack of critical thinking by thinking that, because I don’t agree with you, I must be the exact opposite. My child, the world is not black and white.

                You’re projecting your struggle with cognitive dissonance onto me, make no mistake about it.

        • LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Numbers 5:11-22

          If your wife is unfaithful, she should go to the priest and get a concoction to abort the pregnancy conceived with another man.

          • GhostMatter@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            It does not say or imply that at all. Maybe in some translations/adaptations/interpretations, but not in most of them, and there is no full consensus.

            • TaterTurnipTulip@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              It always strikes me as interesting that if the Bible truly was divinely inspired that there really should only be one translation and one interpretation. It should be incredibly clear and concise to everyone.

              • GhostMatter@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Even if it was truly was, humans are still faillible:

                • the texts are transcripted thousands of times, and errors made during transcriptions are eventually reproduced.
                • the texts can be modified voluntarily during retranscriptions, maliciously or not.
                • parts of texts are lost and found again.
                • texts reference other extinct texts or what was considered common knowledge that was not written down. So we can only infer from there.
                • Hebrew uses an abjab alphabet, which means no vowels, so certain written words can be different depending on what vowels you ascribe to them.
                • texts are translated by people with biases and objectives as to what it should convey (like the US Evangelicals with the NIV).
                • etc.

                So even if the original text was given divinely, it would end up being distorted.

                This is why I’m not comfortable saying the Bible is okay with abortion. It can be interpreted that way, for sure, but it’s not a definite statement.

            • zarp86@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              20 But if you have gone astray while married to your husband and you have made yourself impure by having sexual relations with a man other than your husband”— 21 here the priest is to put the woman under this curse—“may the Lord cause you to become a curse[b] among your people when he makes your womb miscarry and your abdomen swell. 22 May this water that brings a curse enter your body so that your abdomen swells or your womb miscarries.”

              It doesn’t imply that at all? Please feel free to let me know what this passage is really about.

              • GhostMatter@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                I’m guessing this is the New International Version (NIV) of the Bible. Which is not a consensus at all.

                I’m not sure if you’re aware, but the Old Testament is written mostly in Hebrew and each passage has had thousands of interpretations and translations over time.

                My does not say this at all was too strong in light of the different versions, but you can make the Bible say a lot of things.

                Look at other translations, including in languages other than English and you’ll see that the “miscarry” is pretty unique to the NIV.

                You can check out the Wikipedia article on this passage to get an idea as to how complicated it is.

                • dvoraqs@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  The punishment section of the Hebrew version suggests many interpretations where words are euphemisms for things related to abortions. Her thigh might refer to her sexual organs, the curse an abortificent, etc. I think those meanings still exist in other translations.

    • Skates@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Just shit on this person. What a fucking hick. Just straight up pull your pants down and shit on him.

  • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Alabama? More like Talibana, a’ight? Being ruled by religious extremists - in the 21st (ce) century - blows my mind. Are people still that backwards? Apparently, yes. Nothing wrong with a bit of private faith in the sky man if it helps you in life… but to be a fundamentalist is unforgivable.

  • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Women of America. Get a freezer. Freeze your eggs and transport them home. On all future taxes claim them as dependents in perpetuity. Fuck these asshats. Game the system and make bank!

  • sacredfire@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I heard this somewhere: “You’re in an IVF clinic. It’s on fire and you enter a burning room. On a table is a large cooler with 5 thousand fertilized eggs, and there’s also a crying, injured five-year-old girl in the room. Which one do you save? You can only save one.” The answer for most people is obviously the 5 year old and it’s not a hard choice.

    • marth_21@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Wait, if I move there, as a man, can I claim millions of dependents? I mean they’re just unborn, they count right?

      • Anise (they/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        What about all of someone’s future unborn grandchildren and great grandchildren and great great grandchildren? Public policy now requires fortune telling to see what deductions one is eligible for based on future events?