• crossmr@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m not ignoring that part. You’re ignoring the part where she could have clearly identified the police through the window and realized that in today’s climate it might not have been a good idea to carry a gun towards the police.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ah, so the police were in the right because she did something that, again, was 100% legal, but was not a good idea in your opinion.

      Weird, because that doesn’t sound like something that makes the actions of the police defensible. At all.