• Elon Musk purchased shares of Twitter after unsuccessfully petitioning the CEO to remove a Twitter account tracking his private jet.
  • Musk’s personal gripes played a key role in his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter.
  • Musk banned the account after promising not to, highlighting his prioritization of getting his way over free speech.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/ttBv9

  • PureTryOut@lemmy.kde.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ugh, I feel the same. I know the top 1% of the world or whatever emits tons and tons more CO2 per year than the other 99%, but I didn’t know it was this bad. That plane is flying multiple times per day. Sure Musk is probably not in it all the time, but that doesn’t matter.

    Private jets should be banned all together, let’s see how quickly they suddenly find out the internet exists.

    • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Things like this are perfect reminders that we don’t have to change every person on the planet, just eliminate the erronneous emissions.

      • Ænima@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Eliminate the erroneous emissions. Interesting take on the ol’ “eat the rich.” I like it!

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      9 months ago

      All air travel should have fuel and emissions tax. Normalize them to commercial airliners. That’ll incentivize larger, more efficient plane designs. It’ll also punish private jets. Also charge a fee for any planes not at least X% full. Also give discounts and waive fees for planes over X size that service under-served airports.

      A bunch of regulations like this should make private planes prohibitively expensive, like 10-20x their current cost. But that’s a lot of legislation that huge corporations and billionaires would oppose.

      • AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        Planes are already pretty fuel efficient per passenger. And larger planes are unlikely, because this would mean all runways they want to use must be extended so the can start and land there.