I’ve been grappling with a concern that I believe many of us share: the lack of privacy controls on Lemmy. As it stands, our profiles are public, and all our posts and comments are visible to anyone who cares to look. I don’t even care about privacy all that much, but this level of transparency feels to me akin to sharing my browser history with the world, a discomforting thought to say the least.

While the open nature of Lemmy can foster community and transparency, it also opens the door to potential misuse. Our post history can be scrutinized by creeps or stalkers, our opinions can be nitpicked based on past statements, and we can even become targets for mass downvoting. This lack of privacy control can deter users from actively participating in discussions and sharing their thoughts freely.

Even platforms like Twitter and Facebook, often criticized for their handling of user data, provide some level of access control. Users can choose who sees their timeline: friends/followers, the public or nobody. This flexibility allows users to control their online presence and decide who gets to see their content.

The current state of affairs on Lemmy forces us into a cycle of creating new accounts or deleting old posts to maintain some semblance of privacy. This is not only time-consuming but also detracts from the user experience. It’s high time we address this issue and discuss potential solutions.

One possible solution could be the introduction of profile privacy settings, similar to those found on other social media platforms. This would give users the flexibility to choose their level of privacy and control over their content without having to resort to manual deletion or account purging.

I believe that privacy is a fundamental right, and we should have the ability to control who sees our content. I’m interested in hearing your thoughts on this matter. How do you feel about the current privacy settings on Lemmy? What changes would you like to see? Let’s start a conversation and work towards making Lemmy a platform that respects and upholds our privacy.

  • LWD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I like that there is no “private” accounts. This is a feature not a bug.

    I’m not trying to argue against privacy…

    I appreciate your honesty but this seems to conflict

    • Mr. Satan@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      How is this conflicting? You are a private person same as I, I don’t know who you are, you don’t know who I am.

      How is selective hiding of post and comments privacy?

      If you don’t want it to be seen – don’t post it.

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Choosing who to share your data with has been considered a privacy setting since the inception of Facebook and the subsequent erosion of those same settings.

        For example, privacy settings on Facebook are available to all registered users: they can block certain individuals from seeing their profile, they can choose their “friends”, and they can limit who has access to their pictures and videos.

        • Mr. Satan@monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          And that is the different premise for the social network.

          You do have the equivalent choice here.

          If you want Facebook, go to Facebook. It’s not worse or better it’s different.

          Well Facebook is worse, but the reasons are corporate not design issues (it’s more complicated than that, but that’s beyond the point).

          • LWD@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            We were talking about the definition of privacy, and I was giving an example to bolster my definition of it. We can switch to a different topic if you want, but first I want to cement this definition.