• Shapillon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Currently data storage is dirt cheap because globalised mass production of electronics is a wild thing.

    As soon as we get past our current peak everything production at least on copper, rare metals, and petrol (there’s more, I’m just not knowledgeable enough) and we start to have to ration things a bit high res video streaming will be one of the first things to go.

    • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And then comes the question, what will they delete first?

      Probably old and therefore maybe irrelevant content, but those old videos from over a decade ago are also mostly lower resolution and bitrate and won’t free up as much space.

      So once that’s exhausted, what goes next?

      Who will have the privilege to stay on the platform, and who won’t? Or in other words, who makes YouTube the most money?

      And once that has to be decided, content will be whatever YouTube wants it to be. Which I can’t imagine being a good thing.

      • Shapillon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        My guess would be deleting higher res versions of less watched videos and unwatched videos alltogether.

        Anyway archiving everything everyone does is - imho - a fool’s errand.