It’s a lot easier to prevent an extremist than to fix one after
Yes it is.
But it takes time to get positive results, and far too many people are too short sighted to do anything when the “return on investment” is a generation away.
Every time I’ve seen those type of program started, the following government cuts them and claims it was a waste of money because it hasn’t shown results yet, even though it’s only been a year and you can’t make signifignat change to people’s lives that quickly.
Yes it is.
But it takes time to get positive results, and far too many people are too short sighted to do anything when the “return on investment” is a generation away.
Every time I’ve seen those type of program started, the following government cuts them and claims it was a waste of money because it hasn’t shown results yet, even though it’s only been a year and you can’t make signifignat change to people’s lives that quickly.
It’s not a generation away tho…
It’s not like extremism sits off to the side like a 5gallon bucket and once it’s full someone knocks it over.
It’s like a garden hose. Turn the faucet down even a little has an immediate effect because it’s adding less water immediately.
Every day we lose an American to this extremist shit. Even publicly trying to fix shit and failing would have an immediate effect.
You’re other point has to deal with alternating parties.
If we went back to FDR style Dems that consistently put in work to help Americans, Republicans wouldn’t be winning anything.
FDR only lost two states in 1936, it’s incredibly effective, we just stopped doing it.