• WarmSoda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I told a cop once that he couldn’t use the employee bathroom. The look on his face when he stammered “wa what?” was amazing.

      • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        No public bathroom, just had an employee bathroom in the back.

        He asked, and expected to use it, because he was a cop.

        • Drusas@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          58
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I appreciate his entitlement not being cowed to, but in some places, it’s illegal to not have a restroom available for customers, and I think that should be the case almost everywhere. Sooo many people with bowel-related disabilities out there. Although, I think the ADA requires that all businesses allow access to the restroom for somebody with a particular card saying they require access to it.

          Looked it up and it’s not an ADA requirement but varies by state: https://www.crohnscolitisfoundation.org/get-involved/be-an-advocate/restroom-access

          Edit: Wow, there are a lot more people who feel needlessly hurt by this than I expected.

          • vithigar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            1 year ago

            As someone who did suffer from a “bowel related disability” I appreciate that you are willing to take this stand.

            I will however also add that in case of genuine emergency there was literally, and I assure you that I am using that word correctly, no force on earth that would prevent the inevitable from happening. The desperate determination with which I asserted that need proved sufficient, on at least one occasion, to gain me access to an airplane toilet during taxi.

            If a Starbucks employee denied me access to their toilet at a moment of genuine need they’d’ve ended up with a pile of very loose stool on their floor.

            • elxeno@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              “Nice floor you have here, it would be a shame if something happened to it.”

            • Drusas@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              And that is exactly why some states have instituted these cards which are supposed to be able to show businesses that this person can use your restroom right now no matter what you feel about it.

          • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s nice.

            I’ll be sure to mention it to the store manager from 20 years ago.

          • harmonea@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            A mass international chain operation like Starbucks definitely has a whole team whose job it is to know the local regulations and do the bare minimum to meet them, only going above and beyond if it’s cheaper (bigger building with an extra bathroom was lower rent).

            E: lol why are you downvoting all these replies? I didn’t even say you were wrong about what you said, or that Starbucks isn’t being a dick by only doing the bare minimum. I just said Starbucks probably knows the law where that shop was. How about you take your mad little downvote finger and use it to campaign for better bare minimums?

          • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m mad at you because I want another human to shit themselves while I order coffee at Starbucks. /S

          • Melkath@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            “I read an anecdote. Let me run off on a giant tangent about my life that has nothing to do with the anecdote”.

            I dont go to Portland anymore because there are no public restrooms. The private ones are guarded like knox. That’s mostly because of the staggering amount of homeless in Portland.

            If I worked in Portland and a cop asked to use a restroom, I’d say no and lock eyes with him as I invited a homeless person to enjoy an open tap and a dignified twosie.

        • Cort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh you want to use the employee bathroom? Here, fill out this application, and we’ll get back with you in 6-8 weeks.

    • Plibbert@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Like I love the idea of this. But being real, this probably only accomplishes making psycho cops more psycho. Id say use laxative instead but that’s how you catch a charge.

      • Melkath@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah.

        Roids, cocaine, meth, and caffeine.

        If we prohibited cops from these substances, and piss tested them like the people they have been arresting after piss tests, I bet we would see an explosion of protect and serve to counter the current culture of enforce and dominate.