All these (ad)ons always take priority over performance.

  • relyn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    Am I the only one who doesn’t want any, “do everything,” apps? I’d rather have 10 apps that each do one thing really well than have one app that haphazardly attempts to do 10 things.

      • newIdentity@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sooner or later there will be an API to build your own apps and systems. Then we just rebuild a webbrower, but made it worse

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I see you are rebelling against Web 2.0, where you only need 3-4 apps or sites to do everything! Don’t be afraid. The old days of dozens of sites is gone and now the oligarchy of megacorps will take care of you with your 2-3 apps. You’ll have fewer apps that could go wrong and you’ll ever need to keep up with your 1-2 apps! Eventually the FTC will see the error of their ways and your One App will truly simplify your life!

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I want to shop for something online, I’ll go to a website like Amazon.

      If I want to transfer money online, I’ll go to a website like PayPal.

      I don’t like the monopolizing those companies are doing, but they’re at least more transparent than doing it through a chat app. Can you even do returns for chat app purchases? I did a return with Amazon the other day and they just credited my account. They didn’t even ask for the book (I accidentally bought 2 copies) back.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t use WhatsApp or Telegram. There are better things to use. (Signal, Session and simplex chat)

    • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      lol. "Don’t use the messaging apps used by all your friends and family. Use another app so you cant contact them. "

      • baropithecus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Man, messaging is a nightmare. I use signal with a few of my closest contacts, whatsapp with most other people, sms as a fallback and for work I have to occasionally use Teams and fucking Viber (ugh). At least I managed to liberate myself from the clutches of Slack.

        If only there was some standard way to get these apps to talk to each other so everybody could use what they want. Oh wait, there was, it was called XMPP, it worked perfectly and big tech fucking killed it and replaced it with the irritating clusterfuck that is the current status quo.

        • philpo@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Matrix with Bridges does help a lot, though. Alternatively Beeper. (Which is Matrix with Bridges)

    • dzire187@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, I use Signal with some. But I will have to use WhatsApp to interact with most people. They won’t switch just because I tell them to.

      • Vittelius@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Luckily they don’t have to switch. Your good friends from the European union have a solution for you (And the latest beta for whatsapp features the skeleton for their implementation of that standard)

  • TacoEvent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a little hard to imagine for us Americans, but internationally WhatsApp has a thriving unofficial ecosystem of businesses operating solely out of the chat app.

    I love to hate on Meta as much as the next guy on Lemmy, but this is probably one of the sounder business decisions Meta has made in awhile.

    • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Better than Twitter, but still not great.

      Anyone trying to reproduce WeChat in the west is insane. Nobody needs it. Nobody wants it. The conditions that allowed it to take off in China do not exist in the west.

      The only company with a real chance of success is Apple, and their business model is a little more resistant to such corruption, at least for now.

      • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The rabid duopolist that doesn’t even allow users to install whatever apps they want on their devices? The one that doesn’t even allow alternative browser engines? The one that outright refuses to use any and all open standards or to allow interoperability unless forced by governments? They might be one the worst companies in the world to do it.

        • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah. Apple basically has a captive market. Not to the extent of WeChat, but more than other western players.

          The fact that Apple makes their money (mostly) on hardware sales, subscriptions, and their big-ass cut of App Store sales, instead of advertising like Google and Facebook, is why they are not likely to pull this crap in the near future. They don’t need to.

          The online advertising ship is sinking, and Facebook is a rat desperately trying to find a way off.

  • BubblyMango@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good. Keep cluttering the app until people move to simpler alternatives. Preferably libre.

  • TheMadnessKing@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    During the peak of Whatsapp Controversy, I had 50 out 450+ contacts on Signal. Now it is just 5 people.

    • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mostly because of the 400+ who remained on WhatsApp, the 45 of 50 decided to move back and the 5 probably are running both apps

      • TheMadnessKing@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        True. They stick to WhatsApp as all th convo goes there and it laziness to switch over, copy data and all .

        Srsly I hope people will start installing Signal once again.

  • 01011@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Whatsapp turning into WeChat should make Signal and Threema look even better.

  • skymtf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like FOSS apps keep getting more viable while closed source apps keep getting worse. I feel like the next version of the internet is the one few know about. Even Mastodon is getting better, and Lemmy is pretty much a reddit equivalent now.

    • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because with nonlibre/nonfree/closed apps, user interest is never at the front. It is only considered at the beginning when apps need to gain userbase, then they can exploit it.

      Every app that take away user ability to inspect, modify or share it is creating a path for abuse.

  • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is kind of funny. Some of these features I would see see as Google’s turf. However, since Google can’t create a text messaging service, Meta can use their messaging app to encroach.

  • progettarsi@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    pls whatsapp stop copying from fucking telegram there should be a law to make it not possible this is killing competition

    • adr1an@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But ‘Stories’ are from IG, owned by Meta… so… we rather stay quiet on this occasion xdd

      • ehsan301@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Stories are the worst addition to Telegram. I hope Meta sue them and make them remove this feature :D

        • Yetanaika@feddit.cl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          But I can use them just fine? Some customization options like expiration time are behind premium but it’s available for everyone.

          I think it was premium only for a short while before version 10

          • voxel@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            …you still can’t publish stories without premium. I’ve only seen like one two stories so far (despite having hundreds of contacts and chats), and one of them is a telegram ad. Almost everyone gets surprised when they see the stories bubble at the top…

      • progettarsi@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        first they copied it from snapchat (meta loves to copy from smaller alternatives to kill them) second they added it only people where continuing to ask them for it (me too)

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Awesome, maybe then I can get everyone I know to switch to a better platform.

    • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep, when Meta bought it, I warned my group friend chats that the second they start trying to monetize it, I’m going to whine until they all switch to Signal. Guess it’s time to start nagging

  • argh_another_username@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was recently in Brazil and it amazes me how the country adopted the platform. You can do everything in it. And it’s not that you’re always talking to someone on the other side. It’s all automated. Remember those gigantic labyrinths of menus you had to listen when calling a business? Now it’s all in WhatsApp, but with the advantage of being much faster to read. I asked for a service in a company, they gave me a protocol number. When I wanted to check on it, I just had to type the number on WhatsApp and it would tell me if it was ready. So, no need to develop GUI, sites, and so on. Everything is accessible through WhatsApp.

    So, I understand why Meta rolled this out and started with Brazil.

    In the end, it feels like we made full circle and we’re coming back to the Telnet era of doing business.