After reading today EA’s takes on AI and strategies about boosting user monetization promoting and exploitation of user’s gambling addiction, I asked myself “How can someone defend those company agains boycotting and piracy?”.

So here I am: is there somewhere a curated list of VG companies to absolutely avoid giving money too? If not, do you thing we should do it? It would be nice to have a list with arguments and sources in order to make more publicly relevant the ethical and strateical reasons behind piracy.

p.s.I think it’s ok if you pirate things even without a moral stand behind, especially if you can’t afford games and other media at all, but the arguments still apply

  • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    For simplicity, I have it in regex format

    .+
    

    Jokes aside, Nintendo, EA, Ubisoft, Nintendo, Activision-blizzard and Nintendo are the ones that come to mind.

    If indi and plays well on deck, I’m generally on paying.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      If it’s publicly traded, just don’t.

      The one exception I have is id, but I also don’t preorder, so if they fuck up the next Doom or Quake, I’ll know before I buy anyway.

      • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        This, publicly trading means your company is now the product, games are just a way to make the stock price go up, so they need to sell gazillions and have the broadest possible audience.

        This inevitably leads to flavour of the month design by committee garbage gameplay, enshittified business models like “live service”, and writing catering to “global audiences” with cookie cutter quips and insufferable millennial “humour”.

        All that or whatever the fuck cod writers are mainlining alongside taurine and the tortured soul of Chris Benoit.

  • pelletbucket@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    there’s no ethical consumption under capitalism. you kind of have to make your peace with that and steal when you can

    • Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is what I’ve tried to remind myself of when I’m debating purchases. Usually I’ll wait to buy something on a steep sale or second hand. Or I’ll pirate it if I think the company is doing something shitty. But at the end of the day someone, somewhere down the line is getting screwed over. It all floats up to the top. There’s no trickle down

    • Eggyhead@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m already not much of a Ubisoft fan, but wasn’t this just a response to a question about what would need to happen for subscriptions to take off? What should have been said? In context, it’s more of a hypothetical than an imperative.

      Context doesn’t make for good clickbait, though.

      • skye@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Are you saying that Ubisoft doesn’t actually believe that people shouldn’t own their games and that this was a hypothetical discussion that was taken out of context? Because my impression was that this was sort of a response to people complaining about subscription-based games and DRM content that makes the concept of owning games blurry.

        Because if this position doesn’t really represent Ubisoft, then what should have been said is whatever does represent Ubisoft. Ideally they should agree that people have the right own the games they purchase.

        In my opinion someone should generally own what they buy. That’s why I like GOG, which distributes DRM free games, and part of why I often pirate games especially from large companies. In my opinion the take that people should only have a license representing permission to use a product that is actually owned by a company is delusional if not dystopian, and Ubisoft should be made fun of for having that position, and their games should be pirated.

        Here’s an explanation/rant/opinion I more or less agree with by Louis Rossmann if you’re/anyone’s interested

        • Eggyhead@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Are you saying that Ubisoft doesn’t actually believe that people shouldn’t own their games and…

          No

          that this was a hypothetical discussion that was taken out of context?

          Yes

      • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Context is that Ubisoft is pivoting their entire business model to subscriptions, so this isn’t merely “a response to a question”, but their actual expectations of their users for their business model to succeed.

  • CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    I have a bunch, but off the top of my head: Ubisoft, EA, Microsoft, Tencent, anything that’s Epic exclusive. I should really have Take-Two on there as well but realistically I’m never not going to play Civilization so my principles fail me there.

  • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    EA, Ubisoft, Nintendo, Sony(particularly, Sony if youre buying digital, Sony doesnt give a shit if your purchases suddenly go ”missing")

  • Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    For me, its almost all the big studios.

    One exception being FROM, and a few of the Sony owned studios.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Do you not know about Sony’s sordid past?

      Google ‘Geohot ps3’. Then google ‘Sony rootkit CDs’.

      George Hotz was the first person who jail broke a ps3. and taught others how to do it, until Sony sued him. Then anonymous fucked Sony, hard. like really hard.

      https://youtu.be/66A4zcJaPLk

      • quirzle@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Then google ‘Sony rootkit CDs’.

        I get so excited anytime someone else remembers this shit. Thank you.

        • foggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Never forget, Sony CEO response was basically “The people who had a rootkit installed on their machine don’t even know what a rootkit is; why should I care.”

          Well, fuck around and find out.

      • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m not a fan of any corporation, so they can get fucked too I won’t buy sony hardware but if they port a game to steam I want I’ll get in on sale.

        I support valve with purchases on steam as it supports linux. There was also the fact that sony took the linux install option away from the ps2 (or was it ps3) .

        • monstoor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          From a Linux user’s point of view, Epic refuses to support Linux. They also refuse to support their own games using EAC on Linux (via Proton) despite EAC being Linux-compatible.

          EDIT: Grammar.

          • Vahtos@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Additionally, instead of actually trying to compete and gain users but making a platform that isn’t trash, they insist on instead trying to trick users with temporary free game offers. And if that doesn’t work, they try to strong arm users into going to their platform by buying exclusive sales rights to games, bringing exclusives to the PC gaming space.

            Their CEO is a loud clown who is always spouting nonsense on Twitter. They buy games studios and rip their games off of the platform where users bought them (see Rocket League), and discontinue mac/Linux versions that were fully functional.

            Their flagship game preys on children via micro transactions. They lack so many features on their platform that (I believe) they have endorsed using Steams community features for games bought on Epic.

            I could probably go on, but I think that’s probably sufficient.

            • Kaity@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Fair but you also can’t really judge someone for not using epic and disliking them when they can’t use epic because they won’t support their OS. Also the percentage is growing, steam is supporting and improving, and Epic is going to be far behind when they realize they should have supported linux too.

        • Vespair@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Not allowing reviews on the storefront seems minor, but is in fact an aggressively anti-consumer move given the standards of the industry. They’ve got other issues too, but that one gets ignored way too often for me to not mention

  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Unless it’s a structured, concentrated effort, I’m afraid that individuals boycotting won’t do much except saving you a few bucks. I don’t see that happening, considering the track record of gamers.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tI6BNvxmWD4

    If you live in Europe/Australia and bought tne Crew, there’s something going on about creating a precedent that would forbid games as a service getting killed by Ross Scott.

    • quirzle@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      If you only consider monetary cost, you can get anything free.

      If you consider risk, opportunity, and effort, nothing is free.

      For your statement to be literally true, you must either buy literally everything or literally nothing depending on your perspective.

  • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Do you really need a list to tell you what to buy and not buy?

    I mean it really doesn’t take that much effort to avoid those companies you don’t like.

    Keeping a community list seems stupid, everyone has different things they like and don’t like, and the gaming community isn’t a personal army, despite what others might think.

    • EvolvedTurtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Eh with the amount of bs companies do it gets pretty hard to keep track of

      Plus most people don’t really have the time to dig into all of that

    • Kir@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Damn, man. Are you alright? Why are you so stressed?