• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    In other words, he will steal $600M from the public by this move.

    Tax evasion is theft.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      6 months ago

      Explain tax evasion, in legal terms, because you accused him of a crime.

      • n2burns@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yup, it’s tax avoidance, not tax evasion. It’s morally wrong especially because he has the power to influence the system, but it’s not legally wrong.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      6 months ago

      I want higher taxes on people like this too but are you trying to argue he shouldn’t be able to move?

      Or that he should be subject to taxes in a state which he doesn’t live in anymore?

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        They’re not arguing either of those things. Clearly they’re just stating the facts of the situation.

        • capital@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          So, theft is moving states and no longer being subject to the previous state’s taxes?

          Is that a fact?

          I’ve got a buddy who moved from MD to TX. Is he stealing from MD because he no longer pays taxes there?

          • ZephyrXero@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            If most of someone’s weath was acquired in another state, why should their new state of residence be entitled to it? A weath tax could help fix this

            • capital@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              I don’t really see the significance of where he acquired it.

              Amazon, maybe more than any company, has/had customers all over the world. That money came from literally everywhere.

              When someone says “they shouldn’t be able to do that!” My question is, do what?

              Move? Not pay taxes in states they don’t live in?

              As I said at the outset, I also think he should pay more taxes but as long as states can decide what taxes they collect, this particular issue isn’t going anywhere.

              That or force people not to be able to move or force people to pay taxes in any state they ever lived in.

              But I’ve made the mistake of bringing logic to an emotional thread.

              • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                6 months ago

                Yup, and they successfully argued for years that their non-physical presence in a state meant they should not pay sales taxes in that state, effectively forcing states to subsidize Amazon at the expense of local businesses.

                So what you seem to be arguing is that logic dictates that anyone with the economic power to ensure or prevent the passage of laws is necessarily correct, and that the only definition for a term like “theft” is the legal interpretation that you, as a non-lawyer, decide to apply. You’re saying that, despite centuries and millennia of colloquial usages of the term, both predating and concurrently used with the very restricted legal definition, any dictionary or other usage-derived definition is invalid.

                That doesn’t sound like logic to me, Mr. Spork.

                • capital@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Boy, that was a ton of words you just put in my mouth.

                  You knocked the absolute shit outta that straw man.

                  edit:

                  Now that I have time, let’s respond to this properly.

                  Yup, and they successfully argued for years that their non-physical presence in a state meant they should not pay sales taxes in that state, effectively forcing states to subsidize Amazon at the expense of local businesses.

                  I wasn’t talking about this. You brought it up because it’s an easy point to make, one which I agree with but unfortunately this is where you began construction of the straw man.

                  I think you’ll find employees of the company all paid taxes in the state they worked/got paid in.

                  So what you seem to be arguing is that logic dictates that anyone with the economic power to ensure or prevent the passage of laws is necessarily correct

                  This builds on the foundation of the straw man above.

                  No. With me, you’ll do well not to try to read between the lines. I asked questions in almost all of my responses. What do people want? To force people not to move? To pay taxes in states they don’t live in anymore? No one has engaged those questions because they know that’s what would be required in this situation to get him to pay more state tax.

                  and that the only definition for a term like “theft” is the legal interpretation that you, as a non-lawyer, decide to apply

                  Oh, and then I asked if a buddy of mine who moved states is also a thief because he did the exact same thing with two other states. Y’know, to gauge what my interlocutor believed constituted “theft”. Should they not be able to move? Should they be made to pay state taxes to a state which they don’t live in anymore?

                  You’re saying that, despite centuries and millennia of colloquial usages of the term, both predating and concurrently used with the very restricted legal definition, any dictionary or other usage-derived definition is invalid.

                  Yeah I cheapens the word. If they were using it colloquially, one wonders why they didn’t reply immediately clarifying what they meant. It’s almost as if they didn’t mean it that way…

      • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Does the word theft need a legal definition to exist?

        Outside of any legislative bodies jurisprudence, so the open sea, or Antarctica, on the moon or in open space perpendicular to our ecliptic, is theft wrong based off a legality? Or is theft considered wrong based off a morality?

        Legal≠right, ≠fair, ≠justice, ≠moral

        What is legal is entirely it’s own thing. And even at that, if someone breaks the law, but then no one applies the consequences of breaking that law against them, is that even a law then?

        When the law is arbitrarily applied, like how the rich tend to not be charged with first offenses and just get warnings, then that teaches the privileged to not worry about the law, to move fast and break things, to ask forgiveness rather than permission. But when the winning class doesn’t respect the law and every class under them is constantly looking up for cues on how to rise, weeeeeell…

        The law applied unequally results in no one respecting the law. And that’s the rational response. Corruption kills communities. Corrupted leaders are effectively undermining our society, regardless of their title, be that Senator, General, Judge, et al, they’re sappers, undertakers, saboteurs

        We need harsher punishments, across the whole of life, for people being deceitful, spreading mis/disinformation, telling half truths and lying to any degree.

        The entire foundation of human culture is built off trust and an adherence to an objective truth outside our body. What do you think faith is? What do you think spirituality is? Religion is merely a groups adherence to what they consider to be the universal truth. At the core of how we perceive, ourselves, society, existence as a whole, we have a universal, biological, demand for the truth.

        And I think our law should reflect that to a higher degree. Like if repeated theft can lead to life in prison, one case of embezzlement that results in the theft of 1000s of retirement accounts should be met with an execution.

  • Daqu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    If I had 200 dollars and someone would offer me 60 cents for moving to Miami, I would not move.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    So, apparently he spends his time with a strange rubber woman. At least from the thumbnail pic.

    • sab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 months ago

      At least he’s dating someone roughly his own age. He could probably do like Musk and date a series of women in their 30s, but he opted for a different strategy.

      I hate everything about Jeff Bezos, especially his very existence, but this is the one thing I think it’s dumb to criticise him for.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 months ago

      I thought his previous wife was far more attractive than his current partner. Obviously I don’t know their personalities and such though.

    • Coreidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not trying to defend this shit bag, but looks aren’t everything.

      If the only quality your wife has is “being hot” then I am afraid you lost.

      • applebusch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah. She’s not a good digging plastic bimbo. That guy with his hot wife who presumably loves him for who he is clearly lost.

  • rem26_art@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    6 months ago

    i like that the article mentions at the end that he bought 2 mansions and is considering buying 3 more to knock them down and then spend $200M building a different house.

    If I had to come up with a comically overdone billionaire for a story, i don’t think i could come up with anything like that lmao.

  • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Imagine despising the country that facilitated the acquisition of your embarrassing hoard of wealth to begin with this much.

    Does Jeff treat his parents that gave him a quarter million to start with this much disrespect as well? Or was their part in facilitating his success one that he actually acknowledges?

    • herrcaptain@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I genuinely love your use of the word embarrassing here. We need to normalize treating insane personal/family wealth as an embarrassment instead of something to be respected. With very few exceptions you only become a billionaire through inheritance of wealth undoubtedly built on exploitation, or by exploiting others yourself. They should be embarrassed by that.

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t think there are any exceptions. A billion is such an unfathomably large amount that I’m pretty sure you MUST rely on exploitation to ever acquire that much.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Huh. So the Jeff Bezos Trump attacked regularly for being an ultra-left liberal pinko commie red not only moved to Florida, but moved to Florida so he wouldn’t have to pay as much tax.

    That doesn’t make much sense… unless Trump’s assessment of him was wrong. But how likely is that?